Can Relationality be Distinguished from Abstractness in Noun Mutability?
نویسندگان
چکیده
Previous studies have suggested that relational concepts are more mutable—more prone to change meaning in context— than entity concepts even when both relational and entity concepts are denoted by nouns (Asmuth & Gentner, 2005; Feist & Férez, 2007). However, relationality is a complex dimension, and is highly correlated with other factors such as imageability and abstractness. In the current research, we compared the mutability of entity nouns and relational nouns while controlling for imageability (as well as frequency). People read these nouns in a given context and then had to recognize them in either the same or different context. We found that (1) participants showed greater recognition sensitivity for entity nouns than for relational nouns; and (2) recognition of relational nouns was more impaired by a change in context than was recognition of entity nouns. We conclude that the encoding of relational nouns is more influenced by context than the encoding of entity nouns and discuss parallels with encoding patterns for verbs and nouns.
منابع مشابه
Relational categories are more mutable than entity categories.
Across three experiments, we explore differences between relational categories-whose members share common relational patterns-and entity categories, whose members share common intrinsic properties. Specifically, we test the claim that relational concepts are more semantically mutable in context, and therefore less stable in memory, than entity concepts. We compared memory for entity nouns and r...
متن کاملRunning head: RELATIONAL CATEGORIES ARE MORE MUTABLE 1 Relational Categories Are More Mutable than Entity Categories
Across three experiments, we explore differences between relational categories—whose members share common relational patterns—and entity categories, whose members share common intrinsic properties. Specifically, we test the claim that relational concepts are more semantically mutable in context, and therefore less stable in memory, than entity concepts. We compared memory for entity nouns and r...
متن کاملInterpretive Strategies of Noun-noun Combinations
Conceptual combination refers to the cognitive process by which people combine two or more concepts to represent a new conceptual entity. Literature has studied the primary interpretive strategies of a conceptual combination denoted by two nouns (e.g., robin snake): relation-linking (e.g., a robin snake is a snake that eats robins) and property-mapping (e.g., a robin snake is a snake that has r...
متن کاملDetecting Relational Constructions in German Texts Automatically
Löbner’s theory of concept types and determination (CTD) claims that nouns show different distributional fingerprints depending on their lexical determination class. In order to investigate this hypothesis, corpora annotated by determination patterns are needed (definiteness and relationality). In the paper, we focus on the harder of the two annotation tasks, the automatic detection of relation...
متن کاملThe Verb Mutability Effect: Noun and Verb Semantics in English and Japanese
To what extent are the processing patterns for nouns and verbs universal across languages? Under conditions of semantic strain, English speakers tend to adapt the meaning of the verb to fit the noun in the sentence. We asked Japanese and English speakers to paraphrase simple sentences of the form “The noun verbed,” varying in semantic strain (e.g., “The blender talked”). We then assessed the de...
متن کامل